Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 21-26, July 2007

Cost implications of initial computed tomography angiography as opposed to catheterization in patients with mildly abnormal or equivocal myocardial perfusion scans

  • Jason H. Cole, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Associates, 3715 Dauphin Street, Suite 4400, Mobile, AL 36608, USA
    • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Vance M. Chunn, MSHHA

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Associates, 3715 Dauphin Street, Suite 4400, Mobile, AL 36608, USA
  • ,
  • J. Andrew Morrow, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Associates, 3715 Dauphin Street, Suite 4400, Mobile, AL 36608, USA
  • ,
  • Ralph S. Buckley, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Associates, 3715 Dauphin Street, Suite 4400, Mobile, AL 36608, USA
  • ,
  • Gerry M. Phillips, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Associates, 3715 Dauphin Street, Suite 4400, Mobile, AL 36608, USA

Received 24 February 2007; accepted 20 April 2007. published online 21 May 2007.

Abstract 

Background

Patients with mildly abnormal or equivocal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) scans undergo diagnostic angiography or receive medical management. However, current guidelines mandate different treatment goals for patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD), and catheterization is often required. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may be an effective alternative to catheterization for patients at intermediate risk for CAD.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to analyze the cost implications of CCTA before catheterization in patients with mildly abnormal or equivocal MPI scans.

Methods

Patients (n = 206) with mildly abnormal or equivocal MPI scans underwent 64-detector CCTA instead of catheterization at the discretion of a treating physician. Studies were evaluated by a trained reader, and results were classified as “no evident CAD,” “nonobstructive CAD,” or “potentially obstructive CAD.” Cost data were analyzed based on actual reimbursements for CT angiography and cardiac catheterization. We modeled the costs of two clinical approaches. “Selective catheterization” involved catheterization only if CCTA showed potentially obstructive CAD. “Immediate catheterization” considered catheterization for all patients in the cohort. Sensitivity analysis was performed on multiple variables.

Results

Thirty-two percent of patients had potentially obstructive plaque on CTA. Selective catheterization saves $1454 per patient. Sensitivity analysis revealed cost savings to be preserved even if up to 81.5% of the patient cohort undergoes catheterization, as well as across wide ranges of procedural costs.

Conclusion

A strategy that uses CCTA as a gatekeeper to catheterization is cost saving as opposed to initial catheterization for patients with equivocal or mildly abnormal myocardial perfusion scans.

Keywords: Catheterization, Cost effectiveness, CT angiography, Myocardial perfusion imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: Dr Cole reports that he received research support and that he is on the speaker’s bureau for GE Healthcare. No other author has any potential conflict of interest. No external funding was provided to support this analysis.

PII: S1934-5925(07)00009-3

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2007.04.008

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 21-26, July 2007