Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 26-32, January 2008
Automated multidetector computed tomography evaluation of subacutely infarcted myocardium
Background
Delayed enhanced (DE) multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can identify acute and chronic myocardial infarct. To our knowledge, automated techniques for infarct quantification on DE-MDCT have not been used.
Objective
We evaluated an automated signal intensity (SI) threshold method for quantification of subacute myocardial infarct and identified and quantified microvascular obstruction (MO) in subacute infarct.
Methods
DE-MDCT imaging was performed on 5 pigs 6–7 days after mid left anterior descending artery occlusion-reperfusion. DE-MDCT images were compared with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining for infarct quantification and with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining for MO quantification. Pixels with SI more than the mean SI of a remote normal myocardial region (SIremote) plus 2 times the standard deviation (SIremote + 2 SD) value were considered infarct pixels. The ratio of infarct to total area of a given slice, the percentage of infarct area per slice (PIS), was calculated. MO as a percentage of total infarct area was also calculated.
Results
The average density values on DE-MDCT (5 minutes after contrast injection) were remote normal myocardium of 93 ± 19 Hounsfield units (HU), infarct myocardium of 159 ± 40 HU, blood of 140 ± 26 HU, and MO of 85 ± 30 HU. PISMDCT showed substantial agreement with PISTTC (y = 1.003x + 4.12; R = 0.90, P < 0.05). A relation was also shown between MO determined by MDCT compared with H&E staining (y = 0.74x + 3.4).
Conclusions
We show the feasibility of using a semiautomated SI threshold technique for quantification of subacute myocardial infarct. We also show the persistent MO in subacute myocardial infarct on DE-MDCT images.
Keywords: Delayed enhancement, Magnetic resonance imaging, Microvascular obstruction, Multidetector CT, Myocardial infarct, No-reflow zone
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Conflict of interest: Dr. Surányi and Dr. Kiss were employees of Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc., Birmingham, AL. Dr. Elgavish is the president of Elgavish Paramagnetics Inc. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Mailing address: BDB 101, CVMRI, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1808 7th Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35294.
PII: S1934-5925(07)00345-0
doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2007.11.003
© 2008 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 26-32, January 2008
