Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 2, Issue 6 , Pages 372-378, November 2008

Use of multidetector computed tomography after mildly abnormal myocardial perfusion stress testing in a large single-specialty cardiology practice

  • Jerome L. Hines, MD, PhD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Illinois Heart and Vascular, Hinsdale, IL, USA
    • Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Sorin C. Danciu, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Illinois Heart and Vascular, Hinsdale, IL, USA
    • Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Manan Shah, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Xcenda, Palm Harbor, FL, USA
  • ,
  • Mary Jane Borg, RN

      Affiliations

    • Illinois Heart and Vascular, Hinsdale, IL, USA
  • ,
  • Cathleen Biga, RN, MSN

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Management of Illinois, 900 S. Frontage Road, Suite 325, Woodridge, IL 60517, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 22 May 2008; accepted 20 September 2008. published online 10 October 2008.

Background

Data are limited on using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) as a gatekeeper to cardiac catheterization in patients with mild abnormalities on myocardial perfusion stress imaging (MPI).

Objective

We compared the rate of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 6 months after finding mildly abnormal MPI results before and after implementing 64-slice MDCT.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients referred for follow-up based on a mildly abnormal MPI. Pre- and post-MDCT cohorts were matched according to age, sex, prior history of coronary artery disease (CAD), and presence of clinical symptoms (chest pain or exertional dyspnea or both). Case matching resulted in 154 patients in each cohort. The primary endpoint was the rate of ICA.

Results

From the clinical evaluation or MDCT results, 87 patients were referred for ICA, 60 (39%) in the pre-MDCT cohort and 27 (18%) in the post-MDCT cohort. Among those referred for ICA, 22 (14%) in the pre-MDCT cohort and 17 (11%) in the post-MDCT cohort underwent revascularization. Given the similar rate of revascularizations in both cohorts, we estimate that patients in the post-MDCT cohort were 86% less likely to receive ICA compared with patients in the pre-MDCT cohort (odds ratio = 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.06–0.33). During 6 months of follow-up, no clinical events were observed in either cohort for patients not referred to ICA.

Conclusion

For patients with mildly abnormal MPI followed by clinical evaluation, MDCT examination was associated with a significant reduction in rate of referral to ICA.

Keywords: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA), Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), Myocardial perfusion stress imaging (MPI), Myocardial perfusion stress testing, Revascularization

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: J.L. Hines and C. Biga are members of the GE Speakers’ Bureau. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

 This study was supported by GE Healthcare. However, GE Healthcare had no role in study design or in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data. GE Healthcare provided support to S2 Statistical Solutions, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH) for an independent medical writer (J.K. Noel) to prepare the initial draft of the manuscript, based on an outline, results, and references provided by the study authors, but GE Healthcare had no role in drafting or editing the manuscript or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

PII: S1934-5925(08)00615-1

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2008.09.002

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 2, Issue 6 , Pages 372-378, November 2008