Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 2, Issue 6 , Pages 392-400 , November 2008

Effect of dual-source cardiac computed tomography on patient radiation dose in a clinical setting: Comparison to single-source imaging

  • Sandra S. Halliburton, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Srikanth Sola, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Stacie A. Kuzmiak, RT

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Nancy A. Obuchowski, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Milind Desai, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Scott D. Flamm, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
  • ,
  • Paul Schoenhagen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Imaging Laboratory, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

Received 2 July 2008 ,Accepted 20 September 2008.

References 

  1. Primak AN, McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Zhang J, Fletcher JG. Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT. RadioGraphics. 2006;26:1785–1794
  2. Preliminary report of National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) scientific committee 6-2. Presented at the NCRP 43rd annual meeting, Advances in Radiation Protection in Medicine, Arlington, VA, April, 2007.
  3. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Gerber TC, McCollough CH, Hadamitzky M, et al. International Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Coronary CT Angiography in Daily Practice: the PROTECTION I Study [abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(10 Suppl A):A417–A466
  4. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298(3):317–323
  5. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284
  6. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Süss C, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256–268
  7. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Saba O, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, et al. Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology. 2007;243:773–784
  8. Johnson TRC, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Leber AW, von Ziegler F, Rist C, et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1409–1415
  9. Lell MM, Panknin C, Saleh R, Sayre JW, Schmidt B, Dinh H, et al. Evaluation of coronary stents and stenoses at different heart rates with dual source spiral CT (DSCT). Invest Radiol. 2007;42:536–541
  10. Heuschmid M, Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Brodoefel H, Mysal I, Haeberle E, et al. Usefulness of noninvasive cardiac imaging using dual-source computed tomography in an unselected population with high prevalence of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:587–592
  11. Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C, Alberghina F, Otsuka M, Meijboom WB, Van Pelt N, Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, Hunink MGM, de Feyter PJ: Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis [published online ahead of print September 19, 2007]. Heart. 2008;94:848–854. doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.126474.
  12. Johnson TRC, Nikolaou K, Busch S, Leber AW, Becker A, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:684–691
  13. Matt D, Scheffel H, Leschka S, Flohr TG, Marincek B, Kaufmann PA, et al. Dual source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:567–573
  14. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Stolzmann P, Plass A, et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:766–776
  15. Dikkers R, Greuter M, Kristanto W, van Ooijen PM, Sijens PE, Willems TP, Oudkerk M: Assessment of image quality of 64-row dual source versus single source CT coronary angiography on heart rate: a phantom study. Eur J Radiol. In press.
  16. Pannu HK, Alvarex W, Fishman EK. β-Blockers for cardiac CT: a primer for the radiologist. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(Suppl):S341–S345
  17. European Commission: European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, EUR 16262EN. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2000. Available at: www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/mainindex.htm Accessed April 21, 2008.
  18. Weinreb JC, Larson PA, Woodard PK, Stanford W, Rubin GD, Stillman AE, et al. American College of Radiology Clinical Statement on Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging. Radiology. 2005;235:723–727
  19. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, Frauenfelder T, Leschka S, Husmann L, et al. Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(3):592–599
  20. Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Plass A, Gaemperli O, Valenta I, et al. Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol. 2007;42(8):543–549
  21. Halliburton SS, Stillman AE, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Obuchowski N, Lieber M, et al. Do segmented reconstruction algorithms for cardiac multi-slice computed tomography improve image quality. Herz. 2003;28:20–31
  22. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(3):552–557
  23. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS, et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;246(3):742–753
  24. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Adda O, Treyer V, Wyss CA, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(2):191–197
  25. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka Plass A, Desbiolles L, Guber I, Krauss T, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. [published online ahead of print June 2, 2008] Heart. 2008;
  26. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S, et al. Schömig A: Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation. 2006;113(10):1305–1310

 Conflict of interest: S.S. Halliburton received research funding from Siemens Medical Solutions for an unrelated project. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(08)00616-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2008.09.003

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 2, Issue 6 , Pages 392-400 , November 2008