Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 16-21, January 2009

Temporal trends in utilization of cardiac computed tomography

  • Ala-Eddin M. Ayyad, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Jason Cole, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA
  • ,
  • Asmir Syed, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA
  • ,
  • Milind Y. Desai, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Cleveland Clinic, Imaging Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Sandra Halliburton, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Cleveland Clinic, Imaging Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Paul Schoenhagen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Cleveland Clinic, Imaging Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Scott D. Flamm, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Cleveland Clinic, Imaging Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Srikanth Sola, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Cleveland Clinic, Imaging Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address correspondence to Srikanth Sola, MD, FACC, FAHA, Department of Cardiology, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences, EPIP Area, Whitefield, Bangalore, 560 066 India.

Received 23 April 2008; accepted 13 October 2008. published online 30 October 2008.

Background

Appropriate, inappropriate, and uncertain indications for the use of cardiac computed tomography (CT) were defined by a multisociety document in 2006. We sought to compare the appropriateness of cardiac CT examinations before and after these criteria were published.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated all patients presenting for cardiac CT examinations in the first 3 months of 2006 and 2007 at a large academic medical center and an unaffiliated large cardiology group private practice. The indication for the examinations were determined from the patients’ medical records. The examinations were then classified as “appropriate,” “inappropriate,” or “uncertain,” based on appropriateness criteria. Examinations that did not fall into any of these categories were classified as “uncategorized.”

Results

We evaluated a total of 1409 patients (64.9% men; mean age, 57.6 ± 13.4 years). The proportion of appropriate CT examinations increased from 69.5% during the study period in 2006 to 78.5% in 2007 (P = 0.001). A corresponding decrease was observed in inappropriate CT examinations from 11.5% in 2006 to 4.6% in 2007 (P = 0.001). No change was observed in the number of CT examinations that were deemed uncertain (12.7% in 2006, and 13.3% in 2007; P = NS).

Conclusion

The number of CT examinations considered appropriate increased during the study period, whereas the number of inappropriate examinations decreased. Cardiologists were more likely than noncardiologists to order examinations that were appropriate during the study period.

Keywords: Cardiac CT, Computed tomography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(08)00627-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2008.10.009

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 3, Issue 1 , Pages 16-21, January 2009