Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 170-177, May 2009
Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: A comparison to magnetic resonance imaging
Background
A number of studies have compared 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for left ventricular (LV) function; however, none were performed in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction.
Objectives
We compared global and regional LV function assessment by 64-slice CT (MDCT) with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) after reperfused ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Methods
Twenty-one patients were scanned after reperfusion with contrast-enhanced CMR and MDCT. Reconstructed short axis images were used to assess global (quantitative assessment of LF end-diastolic volume [LVEDV], end-systolic volume [LVESV], stroke volume [LVSV], ejection fraction [LVEF], and mass, by Simpson's method) and regional cardiac function (qualitative assessment on a 4-point scale [4
=
normal, 3
=
hypokinesia, 2
=
dyskinesia, 1
=
akinesia]) in a standard 17-segment myocardial model.
Results
We scanned 21 persons (age, 60
±
10 years; 19 men) with CMR and MDCT. Good correlation was observed for all global parameters between MDCT and CMR (LVEF, r
=
0.90; LVEDV, r
=
0.91; LVESV, r
=
0.94; LVSV, r
=
0.84; LV mass, r
=
0.91). Interobserver agreement for regional function was excellent (weighted κ, 0.81). The interobserver agreement for regional function on MDCT and CMR were comparable (weighted κ of 0.86 and 0.88, respectively). MDCT had a better sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for akinetic segments on CMR than did hypokinetic segments (71%, 91%, 68%, and 93% versus 84%, 97%, 81%, and 98%, respectively).
Conclusion
MDCT provides an accurate and reproducible measurement of regional and global LV function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction.
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, Left ventricular function, Multidetector row computed tomography, Myocardial infarction
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
PII: S1934-5925(09)00155-5
doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.05.002
© 2009 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 3, Issue 3 , Pages 170-177, May 2009
