True high-definition in cardiac imaging will require 4 dimensions of technologic innovation

References 

1. Sun Z, Davidson R, Lin CH. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:489–495
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (349 KB)
   • CrossRef
2. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Tuinenberg JC, van der Hoeven BL, et al. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. Radiology. 2007;245:416–423
   • CrossRef
3. Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M, Gallagher S, Weinsaft JW. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: Comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:246–251
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (179 KB)
   • CrossRef
4. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE, Ruebben A, Stanzel S, Vogt F, et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:27–33
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, Flohr T, Rink M, Sommer T, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:818–826
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Maintz D, Burg MC, Seifarth H, Bunck AC, Özgün M, Fischbach R, et al. Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:42–49
   • CrossRef
7. Sun Z, Almutairi AMD: Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis [published online ahead of print December 2, 2008]. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.025.
8. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. Second edition. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002;
9. Seifarth H, Özgün M, Raupach R, Flohr T, Heindel W, Fischbach R, et al. 64- versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:22–27
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
10. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, Herzog C, Stahl J, Stanzel S, et al. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:8–13
    • MEDLINE