Journal Home
Search for

Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 300-309 (September 2009)


View previous. 4 of 18 View next.

Dual-source computed tomography angiography image quality in patients with fast heart rates

Monvadi B. Srichai, MDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Elizabeth M. Hecht, MDa, Danny Kim, MDa, James Babb, PhDa, Jessica Bod, BAa, Jill E. Jacobs, MDa

Received 16 January 2009; accepted 20 May 2009. published online 22 June 2009.

Background

Dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) provides diagnostic quality images of the coronary arteries over a wide range of heart rates (HRs). Current dose reduction techniques, including electrocardiographic (ECG) dose modulation and prospective triggering, are optimized for use in patients with relatively slow (<70 beats/min) HRs by limiting radiation dose to the ideal phases of image acquisition.

Objective

We evaluated coronary vessel image quality (IQ) at different reconstruction phases in patients with fast HRs (>80 beats/min) to assess potential feasibility of prospective triggering techniques on DSCT.

Methods

Patients (n=101) underwent 64-slice DSCT with retrospective ECG-gating without β-blocker premedication. Image reconstructions were performed at 10% R-R wave phase intervals (0%–90%). Patients were grouped by mean HR: group A, <60 beats/min (n=22); group B, 60–80 beats/min (n=57); group C, >80 beats/min (n=22). Coronary artery IQ was assessed by 2 readers in consensus on a 5-point scale.

Results

Optimal IQ occurred at 70% phase for all arteries in groups A and B. In group C, optimal IQ occurred at 30% and 40% phases. The 70% phase achieved diagnostic IQ in 97% of group A and 86% of group B. A widened reconstruction window (30%–50%) was necessary for diagnostic IQ in a similar high proportion (84%) of group C.

Conclusion

Optimal IQ occurs during late-systolic phases for patients with fast HRs (>80 beats/min). Late-systolic phase prospective triggering is potentially feasible in these patients; however, given the widened reconstruction windows required, a higher radiation dose may be required compared with patients with slower HRs (<80 beats/min).

a Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 530 First Avenue HCC-C48, New York, NY 10016, USA

b Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 530 First Avenue HCC-C48, New York, NY 10016, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

 Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(09)00263-9

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.05.014


View previous. 4 of 18 View next.