Volume 3, Issue 5 , Pages 300-309, September 2009
Dual-source computed tomography angiography image quality in patients with fast heart rates
Background
Dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) provides diagnostic quality images of the coronary arteries over a wide range of heart rates (HRs). Current dose reduction techniques, including electrocardiographic (ECG) dose modulation and prospective triggering, are optimized for use in patients with relatively slow (<70 beats/min) HRs by limiting radiation dose to the ideal phases of image acquisition.
Objective
We evaluated coronary vessel image quality (IQ) at different reconstruction phases in patients with fast HRs (>80 beats/min) to assess potential feasibility of prospective triggering techniques on DSCT.
Methods
Patients (n
=
101) underwent 64-slice DSCT with retrospective ECG-gating without β-blocker premedication. Image reconstructions were performed at 10% R-R wave phase intervals (0%–90%). Patients were grouped by mean HR: group A, <60 beats/min (n
=
22); group B, 60–80 beats/min (n
=
57); group C, >80 beats/min (n
=
22). Coronary artery IQ was assessed by 2 readers in consensus on a 5-point scale.
Results
Optimal IQ occurred at 70% phase for all arteries in groups A and B. In group C, optimal IQ occurred at 30% and 40% phases. The 70% phase achieved diagnostic IQ in 97% of group A and 86% of group B. A widened reconstruction window (30%–50%) was necessary for diagnostic IQ in a similar high proportion (84%) of group C.
Conclusion
Optimal IQ occurs during late-systolic phases for patients with fast HRs (>80 beats/min). Late-systolic phase prospective triggering is potentially feasible in these patients; however, given the widened reconstruction windows required, a higher radiation dose may be required compared with patients with slower HRs (<80 beats/min).
Keywords: Cardiac computed tomography, Coronary artery disease, Dual-source computed tomography, Prospective triggering, Retrospective gating
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
PII: S1934-5925(09)00263-9
doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.05.014
© 2009 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to erratum:
- Erratum , 21 December 2009
Volume 3, Issue 5 , Pages 300-309, September 2009
