Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 3, Supplement 2 , Pages S65-S73, November 2009

Trends in radiation protection in CT: Present and future status

  • Bernhard Bischoff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Franziska Hein, MD

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Tanja Meyer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Martin Hadamitzky, MD

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Stefan Martinoff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institut für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Albert Schömig, MD

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany
  • ,
  • Jörg Hausleiter, MD

      Affiliations

    • Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany

Received 10 July 2009; accepted 27 October 2009. published online 17 November 2009.

Abstract 

With the introduction of modern multislice scanner generations, computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a useful tool for evaluation of the coronary arteries. A common application of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is the examination of patients with intermediate pretest probability for obstructive coronary artery disease. Despite the widespread use of cardiac CT examinations in clinical practice, concern remains about the exposure to ionizing radiation and its potential hazards. Therefore, radiation dose and strategies for dose reduction have become an important focus of interest. Several smaller analyses have shown an effective radiation dose between 6.4 and 27.8 mSv for spiral CCTA image acquisition. The international Prospective Multicenter Study On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of Cardiac CT AngIOgraphy I (PROTECTION I) study, the largest observational study on radiation dose estimates of cardiac CT so far, determined radiation dose estimates of CCTA, as well as the effect of different strategies to reduce dose in clinical practice. The median dose-length-product of 1965 CCTA examinations was 885 mGy × cm, which corresponds to a median estimated effective radiation dose of 12 mSv. However, a large variation in dose between study sites was observed, indicating a large potential to reduce dose for individual sites. Several dose-saving scanning techniques and algorithms have been developed. This article discusses these strategies as well as their effect on radiation dose and image quality. Because the contrast-enhanced CT angiography is the largest part of the total study dose, the following described strategies focus on radiation dose reduction for CCTA image acquisition.

Keywords: CT angiogrpahy, Radiation dose, Radiation protection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(09)00521-8

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.11.003

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 3, Supplement 2 , Pages S65-S73, November 2009