Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 29-37, January 2010

Noninvasive quantitative evaluation of coronary artery stent patency using 64-row multidetector computed tomography

  • Murrad J. Abdelkarim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street, Box 400, Torrance, CA 90509, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Naser Ahmadi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street, Box 400, Torrance, CA 90509, USA
  • ,
  • Ambarish Gopal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street, Box 400, Torrance, CA 90509, USA
  • ,
  • Yasmin Hamirani, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street, Box 400, Torrance, CA 90509, USA
  • ,
  • Ronald P. Karlsberg, MD, FACP, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Medical Group, Beverly Hills, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Matthew J. Budoff, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson Street, Box 400, Torrance, CA 90509, USA

Received 28 May 2009; accepted 23 October 2009. published online 30 November 2009.

Background

Many studies have used multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography to evaluate coronary stents qualitatively but not quantitatively.

Objectives

This study sought to validate a method of quantitatively evaluating stent patency by using 64-row compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and to evaluate the stent size threshold of MDCT in detecting stent patency.

Methods

Stented lesions (n=122) in 55 patients (age, 65±10 years; 90% men) who underwent both 64-row MDCT and ICA were studied. Density measurements in Hounsfield units (HUs) and stent diameters in millimeters were recorded in the stented segments, with the density of the ascending aorta (AO) taken as a reference. The ratio of the average of stent's proximal, middle, and distal densities to mean AO density was defined as the AS/AO HU. Threshold values for the detection of stent patency were examined by using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

One hundred six of 122 stents were interpretable. By ICA, 24 stents were found to have in-stent restenosis (22 interpretable and 2 noninterpretable with MDCT). The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of AS/AO HU to predict stent patency on MDCT was 0.81 with sensitivity of 90.9%, specificity of 95.2%, and the optimal stent diameter cutoff value was ≥2.5mm with a sensitivity of 91.8% and a specificity of 93.8%.

Conclusion

With 64-row MDCT, coronary stent patency can be evaluated quantitatively with high sensitivity and specificity and with adequate diagnostic accuracy in stents ≥2.5mm in diameter.

KeyWords: 64-row multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), Cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CTA), Computed tomography (CT) density, Coronary stent patency, In-stent restenosis (ISR)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: Dr. Budoff is on the GE Speaker Bureau. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

 There was no source of funding for this study.

PII: S1934-5925(09)00524-3

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.10.014

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 29-37, January 2010