Journal Home
Search for

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 92-95 (March 2010)


View previous. 4 of 19 View next.

Training in cardiovascular computed tomography: The Fellows-In-Training perspective

Ritesh Dhar, MD, MSa, Sanjay Bhojraj, MDa, Mouaz H. Al-Mallah, MD, MSc, FACCabCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 26 August 2009; accepted 11 November 2009. published online 30 November 2009.

Background

Cardiovascular computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is an emerging diagnostic technique in the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The recent CoCATS guidelines recommend that all cardiovascular fellows be exposed to CCTA in their training programs; however, not all programs have the ability to provide such training.

Objective

This study aims to describe the present opinions of Fellows-in-Training (FIT) toward CCTA training.

Methods

Cardiovascular FITs in the state of Michigan were contacted through the American College of Cardiology, Michigan chapter, e-mail list and were asked to complete a 12-question anonymous survey examining attitudes toward CCTA.

Results

Sixty (54%) of 112 FITs completed the survey. Ninety-one percent of respondents had a CCTA program at their hospital and 52 (87%) considered CCTA important toward increasing their professional competitiveness. In addition, 93% had interest in obtaining at least level 2 training irrespective of their future career plans. The most important factors influencing their choice of third-party courses were cost, number of live cases, and student-to-faculty ratio. Finally, 47% supported creating an additional fourth year of training in advanced imaging, and 40% would pursue such training.

Conclusion

Most cardiovascular FITs are interested in seeking advanced training in CCTA. Cardiovascular training programs should incorporate CCTA in their core curriculum to meet the increasing interest in CCTA among trainees.

a Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, K14, Detroit, MI 48202, USA

b Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

 Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(09)00528-0

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2009.11.006


View previous. 4 of 19 View next.