Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 2 , Pages 83-91, March 2010

Viability imaging by cardiac computed tomography

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving Street, NW, Washington, DC 20010, USA

Received 12 August 2009; accepted 20 January 2010. published online 22 February 2010.

Abstract 

First-pass perfusion and delayed enhancement cardiac imaging have been shown to be feasible by cardiac CT. However, questions remain about its reliability, and ideal scanning parameters have yet to be fully established. In general, scar imaging with cardiac CT typically requires 2 scans, with first-pass perfusion information derived from the same data set used to visualize the coronary arteries. Reduced contrast enhancement on first-pass cardiac CT images represents reduced perfusion. Higher doses of contrast are required to perform viability imaging by cardiac CT. Approximately 10 minutes after contrast administration, viability information is obtained by performing a second (noncontrast) scan. In addition to the concepts of perfusion and viability imaging by cardiac CT, we review parameters such as scan timing, tube settings, contrast delivery, reconstruction, and postprocessing techniques, as well as the associated pitfalls and technical limitations in perfusion and viability imaging by cardiac CT.

Keywords: Delayed hyperenhancement, Myocardial infarction, Viability

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(10)00129-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.01.019

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 2 , Pages 83-91, March 2010