Journal Home
Search for

Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 206-212 (May 2010)


View previous. 10 of 16 View next.

Coronary ostial morphology after modified Bentall operation assessed with dual-source multidetector computed tomography

Austin Chin Chwan Ng, MBBS, BSc(Med), MMed, FRACPa, John Yiannikas, MBBS, FRACPa, Andy Sze Chiang Yong, MBBS(Hons), FRACPa, Lloyd Ridley, MRBS, FRANZCRb, Michael Keith Wilson, MBBS, FRACSc, Leonard Kritharides, MBBS, PhD, FRACPaCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 29 September 2009; accepted 9 March 2010. published online 22 March 2010.

Abstract 

During the modified Bentall operation (aortic root replacement), a cuff of native aorta is commonly implanted together with the coronary ostium into the aortic graft. We describe the radiologic appearance on computed tomography of coronary-aortic and aorto-aortic graft anastomoses over long-term follow-up in 21 consecutive asymptomatic patients (mean age, 67 ± 12 years) with previous Bentall operation. Multidetector (64-slice, dual-source) computed tomography was performed at a median of 76 months after surgery. One patient had asymptomatic aortic dissection that extended into the carotid artery. Seven patients had aortic dilation ≥40 mm distal to the graft. All patients had dilation at the postsurgical coronary ostia-aortic attachment: mean coronary ostial diameter was 12.8 ± 3.6 mm, which was on average 1.7-fold greater than the adjacent proximal coronary vessel diameter. All patients had at least one ostium ≥10 mm in diameter. In 16 patients, both coronary ostia were ≥10 mm. There was no relationship between time after surgery and the ostial diameter. In patients with accessible presurgery angiograms, no relationship was observed between ostial diameters before and after surgery. Dilation of the coronary ostia anastomosis site is typical after the modified Bentall operation. Asymptomatic aortic pathology is also evident in this population.

a Cardiology Department, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Hospital Road, Concord 2139, NSW, Australia

b Radiology Department, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Hospital Road, Concord, Australia

c Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, Hospital Road, Concord, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

 Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(10)00138-3

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.03.008


View previous. 10 of 16 View next.