Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 186-194, May 2010

Coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: Impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility

  • Kristian A. Øvrehus, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Henrik Munkholm, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
  • ,
  • Morten Bøttcher, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
  • ,
  • Hans E. Bøtker, MD, PhD, DmSci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
  • ,
  • Bjarne L. Nørgaard, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kabbeltoft 25, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark

Received 8 September 2009; accepted 19 March 2010. published online 01 April 2010.

Background

A high diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in identifying coronary artery disease (CAD) has been shown in experienced high-volume centers. Whether this may be accomplished in centers with less CTA experience remains unknown.

Objectives

We determined the diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility of CTA in detecting significant CAD in a center with limited experience.

Methods

In 209 patients, CTA was performed with 64-slice or dual-source CT technology, and analyses were performed independently by 2 inexperienced observers. Significant CAD by CTA was defined as ≥1 stenoses ≥50% or ≥1 nonevaluable segment, whereas significant CAD by invasive quantitative coronary angiography was defined as ≥1 stenoses ≥50%. We evaluated the influence of CAD pretest probability, Agatston score (AS), heart rate (HR), and observer experience on the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), interobserver reproducibility, and duration of CTA analysis.

Results

Per-patient (CAD prevalence, 35%) sensitivity was 88%–99%, specificity was 78%–82%, PPV was 68%–74%, and NPV was 92%–99%. Overall interobserver reproducibility was good (κ = 0.65). A significant temporal improvement was observed in diagnostic specificity (observer A: 68%–89%, P = 0.007; observer B: 71%–89%, P = 0.02), and interobserver reproducibility (κ = 0.35–0.89, P = 0.01) during the study period. Duration of analysis decreased during the study period and was positively associated with CAD pretest probability and AS.

Conclusions

Suboptimal diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility must be anticipated during CTA implementation. A high diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reproducibility were achieved after a large number of studies performed with the state-of-the-art scanner technology.

Keywords: Computed tomography, Coronary artery disease, Diagnostic accuracy, Interobserver reproducibility

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

 This work was supported by a grant from Vejle Hospital Research Foundation.

PII: S1934-5925(10)00140-1

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.03.010

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 186-194, May 2010