Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 197-205, May 2010

Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate

  • Patricia Carrascosa, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computed Tomography, Diagnóstico Maipú, Av. Maipú 1668 - (B1602ABQ), Vicente López, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Carlos Capuñay, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computed Tomography, Diagnóstico Maipú, Av. Maipú 1668 - (B1602ABQ), Vicente López, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • ,
  • Alejandro Deviggiano, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computed Tomography, Diagnóstico Maipú, Av. Maipú 1668 - (B1602ABQ), Vicente López, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • ,
  • Alejandro Goldsmit, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cath Lab, Sanatorio Güemes, CABA, Argentina
  • ,
  • Carlos Tajer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computed Tomography, Diagnóstico Maipú, Av. Maipú 1668 - (B1602ABQ), Vicente López, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • ,
  • Marcelo Bettinotti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cath Lab, Sanatorio Güemes, CABA, Argentina
  • ,
  • Jorge Carrascosa, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Computed Tomography, Diagnóstico Maipú, Av. Maipú 1668 - (B1602ABQ), Vicente López, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • ,
  • Thomas B. Ivanc, MS

      Affiliations

    • CT Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Arzhang Fallahi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Mario J. García, MD, FACC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA

Received 19 November 2009; accepted 6 April 2010. published online 12 April 2010.

Background

Desirable methods for cardiac CT angiography would both reduce radiation exposure from cardiac CT angiography and preserve accuracy.

Objectives

We assessed image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic accuracy of a low-dose, prospectively gated axial cardiac CT angiography protocol for the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

Fifty consecutive patients referred for diagnostic invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and with a stable heart rate < 60 beats/min after β-blocker administration were prospectively enrolled in a single center study. Subjects underwent CT angiography with a 64-row multidetector CT scanner with a prospectively gated axial imaging protocol. If the examination was determined to be nondiagnostic, then a retrospectively gated helical scan was performed. Two reviewers independently assessed image quality and the presence of significant coronary artery stenosis (>50%).

Results

Prospectively gated CT angiography was successfully performed in 46 of 50 patients. Of 794 coronary segments, 777 were determined to be of diagnostic image quality. The overall patient-based sensitivity (95% CI), specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for the diagnosis of significant coronary stenosis were 100% (87%–100%), 75% (53%–90%), 81% (64%–93%), 100% (81%–100%), and 88% (81%–95%), respectively. The mean effective radiation dose for CT angiography and ICA were 3.4 ± 0.4 mSv and 6.9 ± 0.8 mSv, respectively.

Conclusions

Cardiac CT angiography performed in a prospectively gated axial mode with 64-row multidetector CT provides an accurate, low-dose alternative for the detection of CAD.

Keywords: Computed tomography, Coronary angiography, Coronary artery disease, Prospective ECG triggering, Radiation exposure

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: T.B.I. is an employee of Philips Healthcare. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(10)00253-4

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.04.001

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 3 , Pages 197-205, May 2010