Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 274-275 , July 2010

CT imaging of myocardial infarction: Time for another step forward

References 

  1. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Hendel RC, Carr JC, et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; American College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology: ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475–1497
  2. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, Lee YS, Bastarrika G, Chiaramida SA, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:318–326
  3. Mendoza DD, Weigold WG. Evaluation of myocardial viability by multidetector CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3(1 Suppl):S2–S12
  4. Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P, Spuentrup E, Wildberger JE, Günther RW, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging–study in pigs. Radiology. 2005;236:112–117
  5. Rogers IA, Cury RC, Blankstein R, Shapirao MD, Nieman K, Hoffmann U, et al. Comparison of postprocessing techniques for the detection of perfusion defects by cardiac computed tomography in patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010;4:258–266
  6. Mahnken AH, Lautenschläger S, Fritz D, Koos R, Scheuering M. Perfusion weighted color maps for enhanced visualization of myocardial infarction by MSCT: preliminary experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:883–890
  7. Ruzsics B, Surányi P, Kiss P, Brott BC, Singh SS, Litovsky S, et al. Automated multidetector computed tomography evaluation of subacutely infarcted myocardium. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2008;2:26–32
  8. Shapiro MD, Sarwar A, Nieman K, Nasir K, Brady TJ, Cury RC. Cardiac computed tomography for prediction of myocardial viability after reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010;4:267–273
  9. Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G, Vargas JD, Parker M, Judd RM. Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function. Circulation. 2001;104:1101–1107
  10. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, Chen EL, Parker MA, Simonetti O, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1445–1453
  11. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H, Schmidt B, Allmendinger T, Haberland U, et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:298–305
  12. Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Schoepf UJ, Rosenblum MA, Abro JA, Brothers RL, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial volume perfusion imaging with second generation dual-source computed tomography: concepts and first experiences. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010;4:127–135

PII: S1934-5925(10)00265-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.05.006

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 4 , Pages 274-275 , July 2010

Article Tools