Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 312-318, September 2010

Interobserver variations of plaque severity score and segment stenosis score in coronary arteries using 64 slice multidetector computed tomography: A substudy of the ACCURACY trial

  • Sandeep R. Pagali, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA
  • ,
  • Paul Madaj, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA
  • ,
  • Mohit Gupta, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA
  • ,
  • Subu Nair, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA
  • ,
  • Yasmin S. Hamirani, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA
  • ,
  • James K. Min, MD

      Affiliations

    • Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Faye Lin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Matthew J. Budoff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 1 January 2010; accepted 29 May 2010. published online 07 June 2010.

Background

Assessing the severity of coronary plaque for the risk stratification and management of coronary artery disease is important. Multidetector computed tomography has been shown to be a useful tool to measure coronary plaque; however, interreader variability is a concern.

Objective

We measured interobserver variations of plaque severity score (PSS) and segment stenosis score (SSS) as measured by the total plaque severity score (TPS) and total segment stenosis score (TSS).

Methods

Cardiac CT scans (n = 221) of the ACCURACY trial were interpreted by 3 different readers blinded to patient characteristics. PSS (mild, 1; moderate, 2; and severe, 3) and SSS (stenosis 1%–29%, 1; 30%–49%, 2; 50%–69%, 3; and ≥70%, 4) were calculated with the 15-segment American Heart Association model. TPS and TSS were determined by summing the segments for each interpreter. TPS and TSS were compared for correlation and variation among any 2 of the 3 readers.

Results

A highly significant correlation was observed among any 2 of the 3 readers for both TPS and TSS. For TPS, the r = 0.91, 0.93, 0.94 (P < 0.001) for A vs B, B vs C, A vs C, respectively, and for TSS, r = 0.91, 0.92, 0.93 (P < 0.001) for A vs B, B vs C, A vs C, respectively. On Bland Altman plot, the mean difference between the scores of any 2 readers was 3.33 ± 3.93, 1.65 ± 2.88, and 1.68 ± 2.92 for TPS and 4.19 ± 4.73, 2.54 ± 4.02, and 1.65 ± 3.18 for TSS.

Conclusion

Semiquantitative measures of coronary plaque burden, including the TPS and TSS, can be determined with a high degree of interobserver agreement, suggesting their potential role as tools to aid in the assessment of coronary heart disease.

Keywords: Coronary plaque, Interobserver variability, Plaque severity score, Segment stenosis score, Total plaque severity score, Total segment stenosis score

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(10)00356-4

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.05.018

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 312-318, September 2010