Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 322-329, September 2010

Coronary calcium test phantom containing true CaHA microspheres for evaluation of advanced CT calcium scoring methods

  • Ben A. Arnold, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Image Analysis, 1380 Burkesville Road, Columbia, KY 42728
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Matthew J. Budoff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA
  • ,
  • Janis Child, BS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA
  • ,
  • Ping Xiang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Image Analysis, 1380 Burkesville Road, Columbia, KY 42728
  • ,
  • Song S. Mao, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Torrance, CA

Received 12 March 2010; accepted 9 August 2010. published online 27 August 2010.

Background

Test phantoms with simulated micro-calcifications of true calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) density were not available to validate advanced calcium scoring methods or plaque density measurements.

Objectives

We evaluated a coronary calcium scoring (CCS) test phantom containing very small CaHA microspheres and validated a new scoring method for measurements of plaque densities.

Methods

The semianthropomorphic CCS phantom was constructed with CaHA microspheres (volumes, 0.05–3.1 mm3) with the approximate density of biologic calcifications. QRM and CCS phantoms were scored with a new calibrated and automated calcium scoring method (N-vivo; Image Analysis). The densities of the microspheres and 609 individual patient plaques were measured.

Results

The range of measured densities of the CaHA microspheres was approximately equivalent to that measured in the patient coronary calcifications. The smallest microspheres scored with the calibrated/automated and the Agatston methods had volumes of 0.075 mm3 and 0.27 mm3, respectively. The standard deviations of the mass scores of the microspheres ranged from 0.02 to 0.17 mg with regression slope of 0.962 and R2 = 0.997. The relationship of measured density to measured mass of the patient plaques was similar to that of the microspheres, suggesting that vascular calcifications are CaHA density.

Conclusions

The CaHA microspheres of the CCS test phantom were found to be representative in density and size of coronary calcifications. The measurements show that CT calcium scoring underestimates plaque density and greatly overestimates volume. The heterogeneity of calcium concentration densities measured in the patient plaques was due largely to CT scanner measurement errors.

Keywords: Atherosclerotic plaque characterization, Calcium scoring phantom, Cardiac multidetector CT (MDCT), Coronary calcium scoring, Coronary plaque, Plaque density, Small vascular plaque

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: Ben A. Arnold is the president and principle owner of Image Analysis, Inc., which constructed the CCS Phantom and owns the N-vivo™ calcium scoring software used for the measurements and the patents listed in the References. LA Biomedical Research Institute uses the software in clinical research but has no financial interest in the products or potential conflicts. The rest of the authors report no conflicts of interest.

PII: S1934-5925(10)00467-3

doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2010.08.004

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume 4, Issue 5 , Pages 322-329, September 2010