Advertisement
Correspondence|Articles in Press

Discussion about P classification in CAR-RADS2.0: Plaque burden sub-classification

Published:February 03, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2023.01.045
      We are very pleased to see the release of CAR-RADS version 2.0
      • Cury R.C.
      • Leipsic J.
      • Abbara S.
      • et al.
      CAD-RADS 2.0 - 2022 coronary artery disease-reporting and data system: an expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT), the American college of cardiology (ACC), the American college of radiology (ACR), and the north America society of cardiovascular imaging (NASCI).
      in which the plaque burden sub-classification was recommended by SCCT as a part of the diagnosis report for the first time. Indeed, the information about the qualitative and quantitative of plaque burden on CCTA has strong association with heart adverse events
      • Shaw L.J.
      • Blankstein R.
      • Bax J.J.
      • et al.
      Society of cardiovascular computed tomography/north American society of cardiovascular imaging - expert consensus document on coronary CT imaging of atherosclerotic plaque.
      and can offer stronger prognostic value than merely the presence or absence of anatomical stenosis and clinical variables.
      • Mortensen M.B.
      • Dzaye O.
      • Steffensen F.H.
      • et al.
      Impact of plaque burden versus stenosis on ischemic events in patients with coronary atherosclerosis.
      But, when we try to write a report with reference to the guideline, we meet a puzzle that “Visual" (observation) is obviously a vague concept, which will be resulting in phenomenon that for same plaque lesson the same doctor give different conclusion before and after and different doctors at the same time. And also, the concepts of “Visual” seems cannot cover the whole situation clinically (refer examples Fig. 1).
      Fig. 1
      Fig. 1Upper panel. Female, 65y/o, known CAD for 17 years with hypertension of 3 years and stable angina about 2 years. The CCTA (left to right indicating LAD, LCX and RCA).showed severe non-calcified and calcified plaque burden on multi-segments of three coronary arteries as P 4 refer to the figure in the text, but CAC 897 as P3. Lower panel. Man, 51y/o, heavy smoker with history of diabetes mellitus of more than 30 years, presented with unstable angina for an week. The CCTA (left to right indicating LAD, LCX and RCA) showed more severe dominance calcified plaque than figure 1 on multi-segments of three coronary arteries as P 4 refer to the figure in the text. The calcified plaque scans showed CAC=2890. The two cases showed apparently different plaque characteristics and plaque burden but both can be classified as P4 grade, the different clinical importance for the same grade should be concerned and discussed. CAD: coronary artery disease; CAC: Coronary calcification score; CCTA: coronary computed tomography angiography; LAD: left anterior descending; LCX: left circumflex; RCA: right coronary artery.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      Full access to the journal is a member benefit for SCCT Members, Login via the SCCT website to access all journal content.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cury R.C.
        • Leipsic J.
        • Abbara S.
        • et al.
        CAD-RADS 2.0 - 2022 coronary artery disease-reporting and data system: an expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT), the American college of cardiology (ACC), the American college of radiology (ACR), and the north America society of cardiovascular imaging (NASCI).
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022; 15: 1974-2001https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.07.002
        • Shaw L.J.
        • Blankstein R.
        • Bax J.J.
        • et al.
        Society of cardiovascular computed tomography/north American society of cardiovascular imaging - expert consensus document on coronary CT imaging of atherosclerotic plaque.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021; 15: 93-109https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2020.11.002
        • Mortensen M.B.
        • Dzaye O.
        • Steffensen F.H.
        • et al.
        Impact of plaque burden versus stenosis on ischemic events in patients with coronary atherosclerosis.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76: 2803-2813https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.021